Role & capabilities
- Remote observation
- Armed support configuration
- Primary domain
- Land
- System type
- Ground multirole vehicle
- Developer / manufacturer
- UFORCE — LIUT platform
- Origin / production countries
- Ukraine
- Other names
- Lyut; Лють
- Variants / configurations
- Not distinguished in reviewed sources
- Operators / programme customers
- Defence Forces of Ukraine
Evidence & current status
MoD establishes use/testing and adoption. UFORCE's page gives differing 12/10 and 11/9 km/h speed pairs and 7/10 km digital-link claims, so definitive speed/control distance is omitted.
LIUT, also transliterated Lyut, is a Ukrainian ground robotic system for observation and armed support. Ukraine's Ministry of Defence announced codification and adoption in March 2025, explicitly stating that the system had been tested in combat conditions. UFORCE now presents LIUT as part of its land-platform portfolio, providing a direct supplier identity alongside the earlier government announcement.
The ministry describes an electric vehicle compact enough for transport in a military pickup. UFORCE advertises remote digital and satellite communications, day/night cameras and optional mission equipment. Its descriptions of assisted sensing and a weapon module should not be read as evidence that the entire vehicle operates without human supervision. The official account describes operator control.
The supplier's page contains inconsistent speed and digital-link figures in different sections. Those values are not reconciled by selecting the largest number. Battery travel distances are retained as supplier claims for the stated configuration, without implying a radius for a complete mission. Family-level military use is documented; production totals and the dates of specific updated configurations require further evidence.
Sourced specifications
Figures apply to the named configuration. Maximum values are not guaranteed operating performance.
| Specification | Reported value | Context & source |
|---|---|---|
| Configuration | Not established in the reviewed public sources. | Public evidence gap. No estimate or neighbouring variant value has been substituted. Source |
| Mobility | Electric motor drive | Government description of the adopted configuration. Source |
| Dimensions | Not established in the reviewed public sources. | Public evidence gap. No estimate or neighbouring variant value has been substituted. Source |
| Mass | Not established in the reviewed public sources. | Public evidence gap. No estimate or neighbouring variant value has been substituted. Source |
| Payload | Not established in the reviewed public sources. | Public evidence gap. No estimate or neighbouring variant value has been substituted. Source |
| Endurance | Not established in the reviewed public sources. | Public evidence gap. No estimate or neighbouring variant value has been substituted. Source |
| Range | 28 km per charge; up to 40 km with additional batteries | Current supplier travel-range claims; loading and terrain unspecified. Source |
| Speed | Not established in the reviewed public sources. | Public evidence gap. No estimate or neighbouring variant value has been substituted. Source |
| Terrain / environment | Not established in the reviewed public sources. | Public evidence gap. No estimate or neighbouring variant value has been substituted. Source |
| Sensors | Day and night cameras | Supplier-published configuration; not an independent acceptance result. Source |
| Communications / control | Remote digital and satellite-link options | Different numerical link distances appear on the page; no single figure adopted. Source |
| Launch / deployment | Transportable in a military pickup cargo area | Government description; specific truck compatibility not established. Source |
Documented milestones
Codification and adoption announced
Ukraine's MoD reports adoption and prior combat-condition tests.
Read the announcement
Publication history
- — Published reference update.
Suggest a correction to this entry
Follow the evidence
Source types identify who makes the claim. Programme milestones and supplier statements should be read in context.